“City of the Big Shoulders:
They tell me you are wicked and I believe them, for I have seen your painted women under the gas lamps luring the farm boys.
And they tell me you are crooked and I answer: Yes, it is true I have seen the gunman kill and go free to kill again.
And they tell me you are brutal and my reply is: On the faces of women and children I have seen the marks of wanton hunger.
And having answered so I turn once more to those who sneer at this my city, and I give them back the sneer and say to them:
Come and show me another city with lifted head singing so proud to be alive and coarse and strong and cunning.”
– “Chicago” (Carl Sandburg)
This book hit me hard because I was primarily expecting it to be the story of H. H. Holmes with some of the 1893 World’s Fair history as a backdrop. But I was pleasantly surprised.
The Devil in the White City is Erik Larson’s gritty love letter to Chicago; it reads like Sandburg in prose and treats with great depth of emotion the glory, misfortune, and horror that ambition can bring. The chapters alternate between the story of architect Daniel Burnham and the many others who designed, planned, and built the Chicago World’s Fair, and the story of H. H. Holmes, one of America’s early serial killers, who operated in the area around that time. Larson lets the two narratives sit beside each other without any great need for explanation. The fact that he doesn’t urge the reader to make any specific connection between their themes leaves the reader with feelings of intangibility and enormity that would have otherwise been spoiled.
For all of its merits, what makes this book successful isn’t the humanity Larson preserves in his subjects, the detail he is able to provide from his extensive research, or the fact that it reads slightly more like a novel than it does a historical narrative. It’s that he portrays Chicago as an entity of its own and instills that entity with its true essence. This is perhaps only graspable if you’ve spent a certain amount of time in Chicago. I hope, though, that it does impart some sense of the city’s deeper history to those who have not visited.
As for Larson’s treatment of H. H. Holmes, I loved his victim-centric perspective. The author spends more of the time talking about who Holmes’s known victims were, what dreams and aspirations they sought to fulfill in Chicago, and how much their families worried about and worked to find them after they went missing. As sensationalist and romantic as Larson is about some aspects of the fair, he turns his eye on Holmes in a matter-of-fact way, never letting his audience forget the man’s true nature. I’m a reader who knew quite a bit about Holmes, but this book helped me get to know his victims in such an intimate way that I kept praying they would take the first train out of Chicago as soon as he became involved with them.
Overall, I found that Larson treats history with respect for its nuance and complexity, although I would have appreciated a clearer focus on the exploitation of indigenous peoples that occurred during the fair. It seems, at times, that the author becomes so swept up in the glamor of the event that he forgets to provide a true balance; brief mentions of the squalor in the “Black City” aren’t always enough to provide a detailed picture of the lives of those who, for instance, couldn’t afford to make it to the fair, or who spent so much time building the exhibition and found themselves out of a job upon the exhibition’s opening. Readers are given a glimpse into these experiences, but the bulk of the narrative concentrates on the very wealthy men who oversaw construction.
The last aspect of the book I want to praise is found only within its “Notes and Sources” section. Here, Larson shows an appreciation for the importance of libraries: “I do not employ researchers, nor did I conduct any primary research using the Internet. I need physical contact with my sources, and there’s only one way to get it. To me every trip to a library or archive is like a detective story. There are always little moments on such trips when the past flares to life, like a match in the darkness.” He goes on to affirm the truth that books and documents are not only sources of text information but physical, historical objects. My ultimate takeaway from The Devil in the White City was that the story’s teller cared, and you can’t buy that. And yes, it did move me to tears in its epilogue, which includes a laundry list of ways the Chicago World’s Fair changed America alongside a reveal of what happened to some of the most famous structures erected during that time. I can fairly say I lost it when I learned that Daniel Burnham was responsible for some of the prettiest places in Chicago: The Magnificent Mile, the Rookery on S. La Salle, and the Museum of Science and Industry. I traveled the spectrum of human emotion while reading this book, and I highly recommend that you experience what the White City has to offer.